Perhaps relevant to Pope Francis' recent comments on
decentralization is a discussion on the ancient ideal of monepiscopacy, which
is the notion that each territory - eparchy or diocese - should have only one bishop. Pope Francis
writes, "It is not advisable for the Pope to take the place of local
Bishops in the discernment of every issue which arises in their territory. In
this sense, I am conscious of the need to promote a sound
'decentralization.'"[1] Could a sound decentralization ever include a
retraction of monepiscopacy as an ideal?
Icon of Saints Peter & Paul by Athanasios Clark, from www.goarch.org |
Monepiscopacy has not been the reality for a long time in East or West. But should it be the ideal? Perhaps sharing one bishop helps neighbors realize their unity in Christ. Contrariwise, perhaps separate bishops can provoke rivalry and opposition.
Insisting upon monepiscopacy, however, is insensitive to current
realities, where numerous Churches coexist in relative harmony, each equal in
dignity. Having one’s own bishop helps protect the full expression of a particular Church’s traditions, which were threatened, for example, in the historical
case of American Eastern Catholics who were once subject to Roman bishops.
[1] Evangelii Gaudium, 16.
[2] Ignatius, for example, promoted monepiscopacy to ensure unity. Early Christian Fathers. Ed. Cyril Richardson. Vol 1. Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1953. 126.
[3] "Presbyter" and "bishop" were sometimes used as interchangeably at this time. Michael W. Holmes. The Apostolic Fathers: Greek Texts and English Translations. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2007, 34.
[2] Ignatius, for example, promoted monepiscopacy to ensure unity. Early Christian Fathers. Ed. Cyril Richardson. Vol 1. Philadelphia: Westminster Press, 1953. 126.
[3] "Presbyter" and "bishop" were sometimes used as interchangeably at this time. Michael W. Holmes. The Apostolic Fathers: Greek Texts and English Translations. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2007, 34.
No comments:
Post a Comment